Corruption, Exploitation, and Decay: The Politics of Star Wars

Eric Geller | November 6, 2012

palpatine

The Star Wars movies were about many things — good versus evil, The Hero’s Journey, tolerance versus oppression, and so on — but one of the most fundamental tensions in all six films concerned the relationship between the state and its people. In the Prequel Trilogy, this emphasis on politics was more pronounced: some of the most important developments in the first three films took place in the Republic Senate, as Palpatine twisted that august body to suit his needs. When Ben Kenobi told Luke that “For over a thousand generations, the Jedi Knights were the guardians of peace and justice in the Old Republic,” that lit a firestorm of speculation about how exactly the Republic had fallen. Through carefully crafted speeches and secret plots, the newer trilogy showed us the fall of democracy itself.

In the Original Trilogy, state-citizen tension manifested itself in the form of the Rebel Alliance and the questions that Mon Mothma’s movement posed for the Empire. The major difference was that starting with Episode IV: A New Hope, the strictly political elements took place in the background — for example, we know that Palpatine and his advisers must have held meetings regarding how to stop a terrorist movement without engendering sympathy for it among unaffiliated bystanders. Even for the galaxy’s vilest characters, there was a political dimension to every action they took. In the absence of civic virtue, their new Empire relied on propaganda.

The bottom line is that for all its focus on grand battles and epic journeys, Star Wars is essentially a political story. The politics of the galaxy far, far away take on many different forms, which is part of what makes them so ingrained into the plot of the series. Politics in the Star Wars films are at times nuanced and at times overt, but they are always crucial to the evolution of the story’s overarching conflicts.

Defense legislation, backroom deals, executive authority, citizen engagement, and other political topics are just as important to the story of Star Wars as they are to our own world. With the 2012 presidential election in the United States today, now is a good time to look at some of the most compelling political scenes in the Star Wars saga.

Defiant Queen

The Defiant Queen Calls for Change (Episode I: The Phantom Menace)

“I will not defer…I have come before you to resolve this attack on our sovereignty now. I was not elected to watch my people suffer and die while you discuss this invasion in a committee. If this body is not capable of action, I suggest new leadership is needed. I move for a vote of no confidence in Chancellor Valorum’s leadership.” — Queen Padmé Amidala

With this speech, Queen Amidala unintentionally set in motion the final stage of Palpatine’s long-term plan to create his Empire. The fact that this shrewd young senator was able to control his queen so completely speaks to his mastery of politics. Government is a messy business; it is slow, often agonizingly so. When one is under duress — when one is faced with a grim reality such as a life-and-death scenario — one will go to great lengths to resolve the conflict. When that energetic attempt to solve the problem runs up against the lethargy of a bureaucracy, the tendency toward impatience is often too great. Such was the case in The Phantom Menace.

In masterminding the invasion of Naboo, Darth Sidious knew that it would weigh heavily on the planet’s naïve young queen. He knew that she, like all of Naboo, would be unprepared for the kind of brutality that the Trade Federation would bring with them. He knew that the horrors befalling her people would serve to catalyze her impatience. And he knew that this impatience would produce the no-confidence vote that would sweep him into higher office, placing him on the final stepping stone to ultimate power.

Pacifist's Warning

A Pacifist’s Unheeded Warning (Episode II: Attack of the Clones)

“Wake up, Senators…you must wake up! If we offer the separatists violence, they can only show us violence in return! Many will lose their lives. All will lose their freedom. This decision could very well destroy the very foundation of our great Republic. I pray you, do not let fear push you into a disastrous decision. Vote down this security measure, which is nothing less than a declaration of war! Does anyone here want that? I cannot believe they do.” — Senator Padmé Amidala

Ah, Padmé. You were the great tragedy of the Prequel Trilogy: wise enough to abhor war and naïve enough to fail to see it coming. Less than an hour after surviving Zam Wessel’s assassination attempt, she was in the Senate arguing against the Military Creation Act, her opposition to which had nearly cost her her life. This is actually from a deleted scene available on the Episode II DVD, but it represents Padmé’s opinions about war (and the Military Creation Act) better than most of the scenes that made it into Episode II.

This scene in the Senate Chamber encapsulates the corruption and deterioration of the Republic that made the Prequel Trilogy such a powerful example of political storytelling. Here is a senator whose unexpectedly turbulent morning commute has just demonstrated the lengths to which a mysterious someone will go to assure this bill’s passage, and yet no one has paused to consider what that means. What kind of vested interests are in play, and how much damage will the Republic suffer if their interests are served?

One can say that hindsight is 20-20, and this is true, but the Galactic Senate does not escape blame for the consequences of the ensuing war. When it came to evaluating and acting on the many warning signs that appeared before them, this august body failed. They failed not just their constituents but the entire government that they served. Ultimately, of course, their failure ensured that that government would not exist for long.

Seeds of Empire

Seeds of Empire (Episode II: Attack of the Clones)

“We need a system where the politicians sit down and discuss the problem, agree what’s in the best interests of all the people, and then do it.”

“That is exactly what we do. The trouble is that people don’t always agree. In fact, they hardly ever do.”

“Then they should be made to.”

“By whom? Who’s going to make them?”

– Anakin Skywalker and Padmé Amidala

I always thought that this was one of the most under-appreciated scenes in the Prequel Trilogy. Wrapped up in the line “Then they should be made to” is all of the frustration, all of the obsession with order, that leads Anakin Skywalker to become the Emperor’s enforcer. Even though this scene takes place in the middle of an otherwise eye-roll-worthy frolicking session in the Naboo meadow, it’s hard to miss the sinister implication of Anakin’s words. This was the point at which enlightened audiences were screaming at Padmé to wake up and smell the early warning signs in her bodyguard’s philosophy of governance.

It’s easy to criticize Padmé for being naïve — there are abundant examples of it, after all — but the important takeaway from this scene is that Anakin’s serious concerns about Senate gridlock made him more susceptible to dark influences. When you think about Anakin’s past, this scene makes perfect sense. He grew up on Tatooine, a world that, like most in the Outer Rim, had essentially been abandoned by the central government. Recall how Shmi told a shocked Padmé that “The Republic doesn’t exist out here.” The natural consequence of this feeling of abandonment is that Anakin was never going to be fond of the political class on Coruscant.

This scene in the meadow represents Anakin’s cynicism clashing with Padmé’s idealism, and it is a moment — in the calm before the storm — that deserves more attention than it receives because of the ominous political undercurrents in Anakin’s frustration.

Emergency War Powers

Emergency War Powers (Episode II: Attack of the Clones)

“This is a crisis! The Senate must vote the Chancellor emergency powers! He could then approve the use of the clones.” — Mas Amedda

The vote on the Military Creation Act was postponed due to the assassination attempt, but then George Lucas presented the audience with evidence of a timeless political truism: determined politicians never give up when they lose a battle; instead, they just try another route. In Attack of the Clones, the evidence of this truism was the vote to grant Supreme Chancellor Palpatine the emergency powers necessary to marshal the newly-discovered clone troops for war. So devious was Palpatine that he engineered Senator Amidala’s retreat into seclusion so that he could play upon the even greater naivety of her deputy, Jar Jar Binks.

Fans have directed a lot of anger at Representative Binks for accidentally enabling the entire war, but there are several things to consider when evaluating his behavior. First of all, the Separatists were going to keep preparing for a strike regardless of what the Republic did. The droid foundries that Senator Amidala and her two Jedi friends discovered on Geonosis provided ample evidence of that. It was therefore not a question of whether a war would break out, but when — and with what kind of force the Republic would be prepared to respond.

The second consideration involves the very nature of politics itself. Despite his prior services to the Republic, Jar Jar Binks was by no means a seasoned politician. As such, he was vulnerable to the atmosphere in the Senate Chamber, and this atmosphere was toxic to reasoned disagreement and ultimately to democracy itself. In the midst of this crisis, with more worlds seceding from the Republic every month, the Senate’s first line of defense was ideology, and their chosen ideology was patriotism. In the same way that the newly-christened Darth Vader told his former Jedi Master, “If you’re not with me, you’re my enemy,” during their duel on Mustafar, the Senate was suffering from a poisonous us-versus-them mentality during the events of the second prequel film.

Binks, a novice political actor, had to contend with this strong pro-war, pro-Chancellor sentiment when deciding how to act. His decision would help usher in the first widespread, sustained conflict in over a thousand years.

Exploiting the Crisis

Exploiting the Crisis (Episode III: Revenge of the Sith)

“In order to ensure our security and continuing stability, the Republic will be reorganized into the first Galactic Empire.” — Emperor Palpatine

This is where everything comes together. This is the moment that Darth Sidious has been waiting to embrace for decades. Every other political scene that I’ve discussed comes to a head in this scene as Palpatine ushers in his New Order. His careful orchestrations of Anakin’s enslavement on Tatooine, the Clone Wars, and the Jedi Purge have given him a new apprentice and a fractured galaxy looking for stability and confidence. Like so many politicians in the real world, Palpatine seizes on the opportunity to reassure the people that drastic changes are necessary to preserve the common good.

Like Anakin in the meadow, Palpatine here espouses the philosophy that stability and order are more important than messy things like deliberative legislative bodies or freedom of speech. The darkest implications of this philosophy have yet to be realized — we are still years away from brutally crushed protests and the first Death Star — but it’s clear from Palpatine’s words that the government on Coruscant is about to change dramatically.

Palpatine suggests in his speech to the Senate that the Empire will learn from the Republic’s mistakes. Chief among those mistakes, in his twisted mind, is democracy. As if to summarize the Prequel Trilogy’s dark treatment of politics, Padmé recognizes the new Emperor’s sinister intentions — it’s about time — and utters one of the saga’s best lines:

“So this is how liberty dies…with thunderous applause.”

Thanks for reading this little treatise on the importance of politics in Star Wars. If there’s a lesson to be found in all of this, it’s that democracy cannot exist without an active and engaged citizenry. Those of you who live in the United States should really go vote today. Regardless of who you vote for, you’re strengthening the foundation of America as a self-governing nation. Without days like today, democratic nations would succumb to the same indifference and disengagement that produced the cancer that brought down the Galactic Republic. (How’s that for a public-service announcement?)

Eric Geller is a college student with a political science major who manages social media and writes The Clone Wars reviews for TheForce.Net. You can follow him on Twitter and read his TCW reviews here.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Share This:

25 Responses
to “Corruption, Exploitation, and Decay: The Politics of Star Wars

  1. avatar AJ says:

    Very well said, Mr. Geller.

  2. avatar YodaSlippers says:

    Padme’s assassination was also meant to serve the purpose of unbalancing Anakin and persuading the Jedi to assign Anakin as her bodyguard is the improvised solution.

    He says there hasn’t been a day gone by when he hasn’t thought about her and you can bet Palpatine picks up on that and wishes to exploit it.

    Leia is a lot more worldly wise than her mother but then Padme was raised in a time when ulterior motives and subterfuge were not so much of an issue.

  3. avatar greenpaw says:

    Great article, thank-you.
    The political nature of the prequel trilogy, including Palpatine’s rise has been a wonderful reference for me when talking politics and world history with my kids.
    They can relate to these characters and see; step by step, how countries can give themselves over to tyranny.
    Cheers
    Inger

  4. avatar sompeetalay says:

    We really need ‘The Essential Guide to Politics’

  5. avatar Melodia says:

    This was an incredible article. Very, very well done.

  6. avatar fatman says:

    A hauntingly brilliant observation

  7. avatar RogerRogertheSithAssassin says:

    Meh. The politics in Star Wars have always been dumb-down and tedious to me. It’s neither intriguing nor entertaining. However the Star Wars audience isn’t interested in any of it because they’re either too young or too stupid to understand it so instead we get “politics for dummies”, wherein we’re spoon-fed information that explains what’s going on. And because of that no one really likes or cares about the politics in Star Wars.

    • avatar Sith Mikaeus says:

      Sorry Roger, you don’t speak for me or any of the thousands of fans out there. Please feel free to state your own opinions, but don’t try to speak for everyone.

  8. avatar Peter says:

    Mr. Geller,

    Thank you very much for this informed, intelligent discourse on politics! I myself am both an avid Star Wars fanatic (who would not be unhappy to have a spot on a Star Wars blog such as this himself one day) and something of a political animal. I am a senior in high school and heading to college. I am currently focusing on the humanities arena, including politics as a potential minor or major. Perhaps we can get in touch.

    Would you mind if I use a one line quote from this piece for a presentation I am giving?

    Thanks very much.

  9. avatar Ulysses says:

    Most of the politics is in Episodes I II III

  10. avatar JediWannabe DNS says:

    Do you believe there’s REAL democracy or liberty in the USA, huh?

  11. avatar StarWarsNerd says:

    First of all, when Palpatine was speaking against Valorum in the Senate, every word was true. He really was a push-over. Weak. They should never have elected him. He was mot controling Padmé, she saw the truth in his words and dealt on her own judgement. The problem was not in that scene. The problem was that so many Senators elected him. You talked of his “shrewdness” with Padmé, but you didn’t mention the fact that he practically had the whole Senate wrapped around his wrinkly little finger!
    Secondly, of course Padmé didn’t see the darkness in Anakin! Right when Padmé begins to think he’s actually serious about what he’s saying in the meadow scene, he starts laughing. She’s left thinking he was joking and “making fun of her” through the whole thing. Besides, anyone could listen to that whole conversation and realize how naive Anakin is when it comes to politics. He sees everything there as black and white. You don’t think that Padmé is going to take him seriously with the kind of mood he’s in?
    Thirdly, (I’m not going in any order here) I’m sorry, but could you please stop with the whole “Padmé is naive” deal. Your point is taken. Not agreed with, but taken. Nobody saw the war coming. Most of the Jedi didn’t see it! You can’t expect them to all have our knowledge. The knowledge we only have because we have seen the classic trilogy. She’s trying to stop the war. Good for her! Leave it at that and appreciate the fact that she doesn’t want innocent blood shed.
    I know I’m probably completely missing the point, but I just wanted to correct these parts.

  12. avatar Blackmondy says:

    Sounds like Singapore….

    Can’t be a coincidence that Lucasfilm has a big presence there, can it ?

  13. avatar I am Christmas says:

    You forgot to mention Sidious’s most important political play, his one-sided business dealings with both the Banking Guild and the Trade Federation taxation of trade routes and the Trade Federations blockade of Naboo. Naboo was rich in plasma (the fuel used for space travel) and Palpatine owned the Galactic Republics top plasma mining and refining operation. He negotiated the lopsided terms of the interstellar plasma trade for with the Trade Federation for political reasons. Those business dealings led to protest on Naboo and the Senates taxation of Trade Federation trade routes. At the same time Sidious advised the Trade Federation in the blockade of Naboo, which painted Senator Palpatine as the victim of Trade Federation agression.

  14. avatar SkyGuy99 says:

    I believe politics was what the prequel trilogy was mostly about. The actions taken in the senate is what the Jedi responded to. Politics is a huge part of the prequel trilogy. I think most people don’t relize this.

  15. avatar DashRendar72 says:

    Mr. Geller, masterful analysis. As Chancellor Palpatine might say,
    “And you, young Geller; we shall watch your career with great interest.” MTFBWY…

  16. avatar IliastheChiss66 says:

    I am very pleased for this article to come out. I myself have been planning to discuss the problems that people have with Episode I and politics is definitely one of them. So I am grateful to have read this.
    Most Star Wars fans just don’t care about the politics that underline these movies. They find them to be too time consuming and just boring. I, however, find them to be intriguing since without politics we wouldn’t have the conflicts necessary in Star Wars. That is the thing that people miss about the prequel trilogy.

  17. avatar Ismail Mainor says:

    Great article. I now have more appreciation for Attack of the Clones, which before I only liked because of the Geonosis scene. I like how you followed Palpatines rise to power. I would be interested to see a walkthrough of the original trilogy politics, even though they were not addressed as directly as in the prequel.

  18. avatar Republic_Hope says:

    Mr. Keller, thank you for a very thoughtful and well-considered article on the topic of corruption and the fall of the Republic, but I may differ with you on some points.

    Restricting my comments only to the movies and perhaps Clone Wars animated series, Naboo’s vulnerability was created by a philosophy of disarmament and a lack of collective security from assumptions borne by too many years of peace, even when there was not peace. Such a philosophy gave us World War II, and in the Republic gave the opportunity to a well-prepared aggressor for which the innocent would not have time to prepare and resist an assault.

    Anakin’s statement that politicians should be made to agree may have worked out in a sinister fashion in Darth Sidious’s vision, but it need not have done so; however, given the quality and the state of the leadership during this era of the Republic, it properly could not have turned out otherwise. With enough good men and women and a very limited constitutional monarchical federal republican government with adherence to oaths to defend the Constitution, a stable republic might be able to exist. Let me give you some examples of how it might work. (in next reply)

  19. avatar Republic_Hope says:

    Considering the American Constitution and Civil Rights with a few alterations, we might be able to provide a workable example for the Republic or New Republic. In addressing corruption, we already have constitutional term limits on the President (Did not the Chancellor exceed his?) and need them for the legislators to limit their accumulation of political power. Limitations on campaign financing might also assist in limiting the influence of corporate power on the legislature. We also need a balanced budget amendment and line-item veto that allows the President to restrict spending to a balanced budget, except for bond-financed wartime expenses and only for declarations of war by the legislature. If neither the two legislative bodies nor the elected President can agree on a balanced budget, then the Constitutional Monarch can call for new elections within 60 days, operating on a “default station-keeping” budget with the current government to operate within that time. To a lesser extent, rule changes within the legislative bodies can call for the expulsion of members based upon a clearly defined set of rules of good behavior and cooperative, civil governance. To a greater extent, both the President and Constitutional Monarch can be impeached for specific actions or behaviors and be replaced by popular election. The continuing presence and strength of state, county, and local (galactic regions, planets, provincial, local, etc. in Star Wars) governments with specific jurisdictions with very limited overlap would permit a dispersion of political power and check on the ability of any one individual or organization to gain excessive control to the harm of the citizens. Of course, you need enough wise and honest men and women with integrity, or it is merely a worthless piece of paper.

    . . . and so,

    “We need a system where the politicians sit down and discuss the problem, agree what’s in the best interests of all the people, and then do it.”
    “That is exactly what we do. The trouble is that people don’t always agree. In fact, they hardly ever do.”
    “Then they should be made to.”
    “By whom? Who’s going to make them?”
    – Anakin Skywalker and Padmé Amidala

    Anakin’s vision can be made a constructive reality.
    I shall save my comments about the corruption of the Jedi in this era of the Republic until another time, but the corruption of the truth by them is partly to blame in Anakin’s wavering allegiance and in his fear for his loss of Padmé.

  20. avatar Ben Otto says:

    Thank you, Starwars.com, for reposting this on the main page. Although originally written last November, the lessons mentioned are timeless ones, and I admire your putting it out there to help us see ourselves better. :)

  21. avatar Jedi Are Better says:

    Good job!!!!
    But why are you so critical of Padme? She is a great character.

  22. avatar Gareth says:

    Fantastic article thank you for writing it!

  23. avatar Grievous144 says:

    truly wonderful! Although I ask one question: Why are you so critical of Palpatine? i mean, he’s a bad guy and all, but shouldnt the jedi council have known much, much earlier that he was planning to take over the galaxy?

Leave a Reply